Editor’s Note: This is a guest post by Mark Suster, a 2x entrepreneur who has gone to the Dark Side of VC. He started his first company in 1999 and was headquartered in London, leaving in 2005 and selling to a publicly traded French services company. He founded his second company in Palo Alto in 2005 and sold this company to Salesforce.com, becoming VP of Product Management. He joined GRP Partners in 2007 as a General Partner focusing on early-stage technology companies. Read more about Suster at Bothsidesofthetable and on Twitter at @msuster.
Lately I have seen a number of deals announced on TechCrunch in which five or more different VCs were participating in the deal.
This always makes me chuckle because in my first company we had five investors in our first round and we picked up five more before we finally sold the company. In my second company I had only five investors.
While there is no right or wrong answer, having seen the extremes I’d like to offer you a framework for considering the right answer for yourselves.
The Perils of Many
I understand the appeal of having many VC firms on your cap table. You may feel as I did in 1999 that the more smart people around the table the more intros you’ll have, the more sage advice you’ll receive and the more impressive you’ll seem to outsiders. Plus, if you need more money it’s far less for each to dip into their respective pockets to fund you.
While all of this is true, it’s also true that nothing so perfect ever comes without a cost. Here’s the problem:
Let’s say you have five VCs (plus angels but let’s ignore that for now) and each one owns 5% so you took 25% dilution to get the round done. By definition each of those VCs (unless they are a micro VC – and one who doesn’t mind 5% ownership) will view you as a sort of “option” where they might get to fund the next round if you do well. Either that or there is something other than a financial motivator involved – NO VC is looking to build a business off of 5% ownership in startups. You simply can’t drive good returns that way.
So why else would they invest if not as an option to re-up in the next round? Maybe they wanted the branding associated with a hot company, maybe they wanted to work with the other investors around the table or maybe they thought it was a cheap way to get educated on your market – it’s always easier to learn an industry when you’re on the inside.
These are all dumb reason to invest – of course. But it happens.
So let’s consider a bad (but likely) scenario where either you don’t hit your targets, the market sours or competition is kicking your butt making it hard to fund raise. Most companies hit a bump in the road at some point. None of those five investors is sufficiently motivated to help you in tough times.
Firstly, they haven’t really signaled that it’s “their deal” in the way that leading a deal does. They can plausibly tell others, “yeah, we were a really small shareholder there – we had nothing really to do with the problems.”
Secondly, in tough times they’re also thinking about all of their other investments. Let’s say each of those five partners has at least seven other investments each. In tough times I promise you their time and energy will be allocated more heavily toward deals where they have more money invested and/or where they have a larger ownership position to protect.
Sure, if you become Zynga everyone of those five investors will be helping you. In fact, it will probably show up on their Twitter bio & on their website. But how many of you are likely to become the next Zynga (and without hitting a few bumps in the road first).
Now let’s consider the upside situation where you happen to be in a super hot space. Now you have five investors of which at least a few will be vying to take a larger stake in your next round. By definition you can’t have three investors each wanting to increase from 5% to 20% ownership or you’re fawked anyways. So it will be an internal fight over allocations. This is not to mention the fight you’ll see if you want to bring in a new investor to lead the next round to set an objective price.
“Many” has benefits but it also has drawbacks. If you plan to do it I highly recommend that most of the VCs be smaller funds and ones who are generally not looking to invest much more after your first round of capital. There are firms with this stated objective – seek them out if you want to load the VC roster on your deal.
Note that I am talking specifically about five VCs splitting one round. It might be that over a period of five years you’ve done three rounds of investment and ended up with four VCs. That’s a different story. Each VC came on with different information, at a different price and with a different risk appetite. Hopefully each lead or co-lead their round so there is more harmony in the configuration.
The Pitfall of One
It is very common for funding rounds to have just one VC doing the investment. This is largely true because most VCs have a 20% minimum threshold in order to invest so bringing in multiple VCs can be very expensive in terms of dilution. So obviously before agreeing to work with this VC you better make sure you know them really well. And I always encourage entrepreneurs to do reference checking. Here’s my guide to how to do that.
There is an obvious pitfall to working with just one VC – if you fall out of love you’re screwed. There are reasons why VCs sometimes don’t support deals once they’ve invested.
The most common case is that the partner who did the deal left the firm. You are then a “stranded” portfolio company. You know the drill – the new guy says he’ll support you, but it was never really his deal. If you have any hair on you he can always distance himself and deny any involvement.
You might have a VC who is at the end of their fund and doesn’t have deep enough pockets to fund you if you hit bumps in the road. The VC might have lost confidence in you. You might just have differences of opinion on the direction / strategy of the company or how to handle situations in difficult times.
I have personally seen some VCs who decide not to support certain industries they once had backed. I know that a lot of VCs had roadkill in the Internet Video 1.0 world and many pared back investments. Whatever the reason, when you’re stranded and you have one investor the only way out is to find new outside investors.
And this is doubly hard when your existing investor isn’t supportive. The standard line the new investor wants to hear from your previous VC is, “we’re behind this company 100%. We’re willing to do our full pro-rata & might even like to do a bit extra.” If your VC had stranded you, you won’t hear this – believe me.
Still, most deals involve one VC – just to be clear.
The Squeeze of the “Two Handed Deal”
The most tempting thing to do in a financing is to find two investors to split a deal. In my mind that’s the perfect scenario. You get all the benefits of the “many” deal without the drawbacks. If you can pull it off, I love the “two-handed” deal. If you’re doing well but need a little more gas to prove yourself, it’s so much easier for VCs to split an inside round. It’s both a smaller check and it’s external validation that somebody else was willing to fund.
The biggest problem in two is the “squeeze.” All VCs want to own between 25-33% of your company. That’s the number they feel comfortable owning in exchange for their time & resources over what will likely be a 7-10 year endeavor (if you’re successful). They internally almost all have their secret minimum threshold, which is 20%. There – the secret is out.
So in order to get a two-handed deal you need to dilute by 40% which is an awful lot at the start of your company. When you consider that they’ll also want a 15-20% option pool in the company you’re talking about founders owning as little as 40% after just one round. That wouldn’t be bad if you had just one founder, but if you have 4 you’re already at 10% each and you have 7-10 years more work left (not to mention 3 more funding rounds!).
There are a bunch of VCs out there who don’t cling to the old “20% or the highway” mentality on every single deal and I suggest you seek them out. They are the ones who will often partner better with other VCs. There are ones I’ve worked with like True Ventures, First Round Capital, Greycroft, Rincon Ventures …. just to name a few. And of course most of the micro VCs (fka super angels) also don’t hold to this minimum bar.
The easiest configurations to push for are either one lead VC who takes 20-25% and one smaller VC who takes 7.5-15% or two leads who take 15-17% each.
Rules of the Road
1. Always Have a Lead
No matter which option you choose always have a lead. If you want the “many” deal then give half the round to one VC and let the other 4 split the second 50%. No lead = no one on the hook in tough times = no one to corral other investors to take action = nobody with enough skin in the game to give a damn. Always, always have a lead. Not just to get through tough times, but for conflict resolution in general.
2. Make Sure You’re Stage Appropriate
If you select a lead VC make sure they’re stage appropriate. If you’re raising $2 million on an A round and it’s a $1 billion fund make sure they have a track record of backing and being active with early stage deals. If you’re raising a $10 million B round and a $100 million fund ponies up $8 million you better have a firm grasp of how much of their fund is allocated, how much they have reserved for you and how they plan to support you in tough times.
3. Make Sure They Have Enough Gas in the Tank
In any scenario it’s a good idea to understand where the VC is at in their fund. You can’t ask this kind of stuff on the first date, but ultimately you politely want to get out of them: when their fund was raised, how much capital did they raise, how much is allocated, when they’re raising their next fund and what their “reserve” strategy is. Best if you get much of this from due diligence of calling other portfolio companies and then use this information to confirm with the VC.
4. Make Sure They Play Nicely in the Sandbox
I often see VCs getting sharp elbows out at the time of a fund raising. They start muscling for ownership percentages and start angling to kick out certain investors or angels. I find this behavior strange but now a bit predictable.
I usually counsel entrepreneurs with the following advice, “if your VC can’t play nicely on the way in when they love you the most and are on their best behavior, imagine how they’re going to be in difficult times or when the final pie is getting split!”
Seriously, man. Assholes in good times are insufferable in bad times. If you experience this behavior run. Didn’t you get enough of this crap in high school to want to revisit it again?
5. Always Pitch Outsiders for Follow Ons
I have staked my strategy as a VC as being both stage agnostic and willing to follow great deals by leading another round and increasing my percentage ownership. So it seems strange advice for me to recommend that you pitch outside investors first for follow on investments.
Here’s why – even for a VC you really like and who you might like to lead your next round. You know the old saying, “great fences make great neighbors?” My corollary for VC is “pitch outsiders and you’ll have great insiders.” It just keeps us a bit honest. I think if your inside VC wants to lead a round and is giving you a “fair” price it’s reasonable to not “over shop” the deal and try to drive the highest price possible. Get a fair price from outsiders or at least market test the interest level.
6. Always Make Room for Value-Added Angels
Finally, I believe in making room for value-added angels on every round and in every deal. Yes, I include many micro VCs in this category. If there are 4-5 investors who each want to kick in $50-75k – why would I want to turn away smart people from working with the company? These aren’t people who are going to compete for increasing pro rata in the future. They aren’t people who are going to demand minimum ownership %’s.
They’re all dopeness, no wackness (presuming they are great angels and not PITAs).
If your new prospective VC is opposed to a great angel or a small investment from Founder Collective, Felicis Ventures, SV Angel or similar – please re-read number 4 above.
Image: Cassius Marcellus Coolidge
Marco Arment, the former CTO of the Tumblr blog platform, is best known these days for his time-shifting reading app Instapaper. But he could start a side-job as a financial advisor to start-ups. His motto: Get the money from your customers, not investors.
Arment’s more traditional take is built largely on the idea that if he puts out a good product, there’s no shame in asking customers to pay for it. And the more they pay, the less he needs to rely on outside investors. Arment said many developers are of the mindset that they need to amass a huge number of eyeballs through free services. But they don’t focus enough on building a solid product that can command loyalty and payment from consumers, and instead try to gain profitability through advertising and turning to outside venture capital.
By contrast, Arment says his efforts to monetize Instapaper have been successful because he was able to leverage the hard work he put into his paid versions and the good will he’s gotten back from consumers. And that has allowed him to avoid outside funding, something he plans on doing for the forseeable future.
Don’t Take Funding if You Don’t Need It
“If a service can be profitable and breakeven without VC money, you don’t need to take it,” Arment told me in an interview. “There’s no reason for developers to get a lot of users without charging. There’s another path. My goal is to spread that message: Charge for something and make more than you spend.”
Arment launched Instapaper as a free website in January 2008 and became profitable later that fall when he first began selling a paid iPhone app alongside a free version. He’s been profitable ever since. Arment won’t disclose his revenue, but he said he can cover his expenses and can afford to hire a couple more people if he needed. He left his Tumblr job in September to devote himself to Instapaper.
Though Arment maintains a free iPhone app, he said the focus of the company has been on the paid versions which are updated first (a new update is expected in the next month or so). He has yet to release a free iPad version and has only gotten three emails about the lack of it. Most seem happy to pay for the $5 iPad version. Between 25 and 33 percent of people pay for the $5 paid iPhone version. In fact, as an experiment, he pulled the free iPhone app from the app store for a week a little while back and found that only one person emailed. Sales of the paid version didn’t go up, but they didn’t go down either, he said.
“The free version isn’t really competing as much as I expected with the paid version; a lot of people go straight to the paid version,” he said. “It was only a week but the people who were going to the free version would not have gone to the paid version.”
Let Users Thank You by Paying You
That’s what’s allowed Arment to really focus on the paid segment. In fact, he still questions the value of the free version at times because it can leave a more negative impression for users with its limited set of features. Arment said his paying users have surprised him with their support. He started a $1 a month subscription plan in October that didn’t actually offer much in the way of extra features. It was more of a way to let users show their support for Instapaper. He said the response was overwhelmingly positive.
“That was a huge surprise to me how well it’s doing given there’s no real incentive to do it besides good will. But it ends up that good will is powerful,” Arment said. “It shows that people will pay for something they like because they want to ensure its future.”
Arment is testing the theory again with a new API that leverages his subscription plan. For developers who want to build apps with Instapaper integration, Arment said last month he will require their users to subscribe to Instapaper. Again, the response has been very positive, said Arment. Two hundred developers have applied to get access to the API. All this money-making has allowed Arment to sidestep venture capital money. He has had repeated offers, but Arment said accepting VC funding is akin to taking on a new boss, and the act of raising and maintaining money is a full-time job, he said.
Venture Capital Is Like Having Another Boss
“If you can go without funding, you can be a one- or two-person shop without a whole level of bosses,” he said. “You’re not worried about getting more money and getting diluted anymore.”
Arment’s approach doesn’t work for everyone. He was fortunate to be able to this as a side job and build it up while at Tumblr. And he acknowledges that the lack of funding could be a problem if he wanted to build a staff quickly. But he believes his experience shows that a more old-school approach to building a business and developing a following with consumers is a viable one for entrepreneurs that should be explored more. He may not the biggest company, but he can be a profitable one for a while.
“I don’t need the entire market,” Arment said. “I can get five percent of the market and be rich.”
Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):
- Why Apple Hasn’t Sewn Up the Tablet Market — Yet
- Lessons From Twitter: How to Play Nice With Ecosystem Partners
- Rogue Devices: The Consumer Influence on Enterprise Mobility, Part 1
Surface Encounters proudly guarantees purchaser satisfaction and selling price putting in granite assurance. “I’m at all times skeptical going with new companies, but your workers has crafted me a believer!” - Steve, Indianapolis
Surface Encounters is a fast-growing surface encounters organisation and, yet they have stored tempo with all the recent consumer referrals. “This enterprise is just about the most reasonably priced, trusted and pleasant firms while in the entire state. I might encourage them to anybody.” - Mike R., South Bend
Lots of labor goes into establishing gorgeous countertops from nature. The process comprises laser measurement creative vein matching, precision diamond and water-jet cutting, edging and certified installation. An individual cannot simply contact within their order for a customized countertop and also have it inside of a day or two. Top quality usually takes time.
Surface Encounters encourages most people to go to a showroom to master a great deal more about healthy stone countertops. Other than the assortment and fabrication procedure, some other crucial portion of customer care is making sure an individual is aware how to treatment for their granite countertop to keep it trying new for decades to come.
Granite is definitely a attractive all-natural stone products that's a well-known material used for countertops and floor tiles in kitchens and bathrooms. Granite has surpassed marble in attractiveness because is it even more resilient and better to care for. Granite is unmatched by synthetic programs for its strength and sturdiness, tolerance to temperature adjustments and resistance to stains and scratches.
Granite is really a normally shaped stone that's quarried from deep within the earth, harvested, reduce, polished, sealed and put in in houses to add splendor, elegance and design. As a result of it's a pure product or service, no two slabs are specifically alike. Granite is accessible in numerous colors from the numerous minerals which are determined with the rock. Considering that it arrives from all over the entire world, totally different regions and environmental components allow it to be extraordinary.
Granite is predominantly made up of quartz crystal, nonetheless it also comprises many different quantities of other metals this includes feldspar, mica, copper and iron. Some granite could possibly have bits of gold or silver. The quantity of just about every metal depends around the area it comes from. All granite is formed right into a really difficult stone by warmth and strain. Rain adds other minerals since it is forming. Its accessible all over the entire world, in each and every nation, and each region will deliver a surface encounters distinct variety of granite.
Surface Encounters state-of-the-art machinery makes certain the greatest top quality completed item because they layout and design a few of the greatest kitchens and bathrooms. Granite Countertops greatly enhance the warmth and splendor of households despite the fact that escalating their worth and improving lifestyles.
Surface Encounters can also be involved with worker morale; delighted staff are even more likely to contribute to the success of the business enterprise. In addition to being a victorious service and one particular which is superb to function for, Surface Encounters does their piece to protect our planet.
Surface Encounters does what's correct for their consumers, employees and also the surroundings. Surface Encounters makes use of state-of-the-art drinking water recycling capabilities to recycle as much as 43,000 gallons of drinking water daily. In addition, one hundred percent of the scrap produced in making elegant kitchens and spectacular baths is re-used as aggregate in street constructing, surface preparations and concrete.
The Columbus, Ohio Grand Opening of Surface Encounters qualities an artwork gallery showroom of Granite, Marble, Quartz and Engineered Stone counter tops. Shop Supervisor, Scott Donnelly unlocked the doors of the showroom at 4717 Roberts Road, just west with the I-270 Beltway. The Surface Encounters production approach employs precision, automated technology throughout the fabrication in the customer's personalized counter top, this sort of as: a laser measuring alignment that packages the diamond-tipped sculpturing blades. Surface Encounters' operation comprises computer-driven software package that perpetuates the stone's normal veins. Just about every Surface Encounter keep has a minimum of 1 registered, interior designer to assist you in developing the completed challenge that you're looking for. The craftsmanship continues with the
Property owners are determining to remodel rather than sell their homes in today’s market
Granite countertops have grown to be a prime preference between Wixom consumers for kitchen remodeling projects. Kitchen remodeling is often the 1st challenge tackled with households paying 3,000 hrs or more per year within their kitchen. Granite countertops produce an natural environment that enhances the level of quality time spent with family members and colleagues. Granite countertops previous a lifetime and enrich the top quality of real estate.
Surface Encounters Wixom save manager, Sal Dellacasa, says there are many motives individuals are choosing granite for their countertop desires. “Granite countertops add beauty and elegance to a kitchen. Granite is accessible in a selection of vibrant colours and loaded textures and its strength and sturdiness is unmatched by any other healthy stone or artificial countertop material.”
Surface Encounters’ clientele get pleasure from specialist service and also a friendly, helpful employees to information them through the kitchen remodeling course of action. A lot of of Surface Encounters new clientele are referred to them by prior users.
"This enterprise is just about the most cost effective, dependable, and friendly corporations within the complete state. I would highly recommend them to anyone." Mike R. Clinton Twp., MI
"The corporation has constantly been there to help me in no matter what way achievable. Thank you a lot!" David V. Lapeer, MI
Surface Encounters Macomb is the home of half-off granite for kitchen and bathroom countertops. Granite countertops by Surface Encounters have rather quickly turned into the prime preference for Macomb residents who are remodeling their kitchens. Kitchen remodeling takes priority with households investing three,000 hrs or more per year within their kitchen. Granite countertops offer an natural environment that enhances the level of quality time spent with friends and family and mates and enhance the top notch of residences.
Surface Encounters Macomb retailer supervisor, Sal Dellacasa, says there are numerous reasons people are deciding granite for their countertop must have. “Granite countertops add attractiveness and elegance to a kitchen. Granite is obtainable in a very variety of vibrant shades and wealthy textures and its strength and sturdiness is unmatched by any other surface encounters pure stone or artificial countertop substance.”
Surface Encounters’ shoppers benefit from pro services as well as a pleasant, helpful employees to information them with the kitchen remodeling process. A large number of of Surface Encounters new clientele are referred to them by preceding clientele.
No comments:
Post a Comment